Law of the Seas Convention: Proposed Amendment
Moderators: Staff, MTO Secretaries
Re: Law of the Seas Convention: Proposed Amendment
Thank you for the information!
I am a little unsure of the status of the Natopias in this organization so far. There is only one Natopia that is party to the organization and to this treaty, as per information given to the organization, and there is no designated successor for old Natopia here. Neither has East or West informed the organization of its intents to remain.
Re: Law of the Seas Convention: Proposed Amendment
Eastern Natopia opposes the amendments.
Currently playing:
Nathan, a person
Nathan, a person
Re: Law of the Seas Convention: Proposed Amendment
The stance of Western Natopia has been received and recorded.Ric wrote: ↑Thu Jun 23, 2022 1:30 pmThank you for the information!
I am a little unsure of the status of the Natopias in this organization so far. There is only one Natopia that is party to the organization and to this treaty, as per information given to the organization, and there is no designated successor for old Natopia here. Neither has East or West informed the organization of its intents to remain.
-
- Posts: 561
- Joined: Tue Mar 24, 2009 9:33 am
Re: Law of the Seas Convention: Proposed Amendment
Many thanks!
Re: Law of the Seas Convention: Proposed Amendment
Moreover, the notice from the Imperial Federation has been approved, now that it has confirmed its accession to the Convention to have occurred.
Re: Law of the Seas Convention: Proposed Amendment
Shireroth approves.
Re: Law of the Seas Convention: Proposed Amendment
The approval of fourteen states has now been met, being more than the three quarters. As such, the Convention has been amended.