UGB annexation of UI
-
- FMS Staff
- Posts: 21547
- Joined: Sun Jun 24, 2007 7:37 pm
- Location: Cherry Trees, Craitland
- Contact:
UGB annexation of UI
Continuator wrote: ↑Mon Aug 10, 2020 10:15 amName & Title: Frumst Frainan Vüqar Rugahi (UGB)
E-Mail/Contact: Discord
Nation: Unified Governorates of Benacia
Request:
Notes:
UGB has enforced its objectives on UI.
Spoiler!
-
- FMS Staff
- Posts: 21547
- Joined: Sun Jun 24, 2007 7:37 pm
- Location: Cherry Trees, Craitland
- Contact:
Re: UGB annexation of UI
Unified and united as they are, were and will be. AYE...
Re: UGB annexation of UI
Due to unclear directives from the imperial government, Shireroth may or may not have a dispute over Sagittarius. I have been waiting for directives, though they haven't come. As such, as a Shirerithian, without directives of a changed nature, have to assume that I therefore have a conflict of interest. Therefore, I must respectfully recuse myself from the deliberations on this claim.
Re: UGB annexation of UI
As a comment, the Shirerithian sovereignty over Sagittarius wasn't marked when the islands were under the UI. I just assumed it was extraterritoriality.
-
- FMS Staff
- Posts: 21547
- Joined: Sun Jun 24, 2007 7:37 pm
- Location: Cherry Trees, Craitland
- Contact:
Re: UGB annexation of UI
Regarding that base being Shireroth's, my vote remains unchanged...
Re: UGB annexation of UI
Map updated. I'm therefore recused for another reason.
-
- Administrator General
- Posts: 4333
- Joined: Wed Dec 31, 2008 10:58 pm
- Location: Republic of Mercury
Re: UGB annexation of UI
I'm not sure on the maths given two recuses, but assuming it's necessary, AYE nonetheless