GTZ > STO
-
- FMS Staff
- Posts: 21546
- Joined: Sun Jun 24, 2007 7:37 pm
- Location: Cherry Trees, Craitland
- Contact:
GTZ > STO
Liam Sinclair wrote: ↑Fri Jan 12, 2018 11:41 amMCS Change Request Form (Expansions/Modifications)
Name & Title:
His Grace Liam, the Duke of Montin
Royal Chancellor of Gotzborg
Harald Freyjugjöf the Generous Giver of the House of the Descendants of Freyja
High King of Stormark
E-Mail/Contact: PM
Nation: The Royal Kingdom of Gotzborg & The High Realm of Stormark
Request:
Notes:
The High Realm of Stormark and the Royal Kingdom of Gotzborg have agreed that for the duration of Gotzborg's hiatus, the latter's Micran territories will be in Stormark's Sovereign Protection.
Provisions concerning the aforesaid agreement have been laid down in Chapter X of the Treaty of Bruges Bay, which has been especially inserted into the said Treaty for that purpose. You may find Chapter X below the spoiler tag.
Amending the Treaty of Bruges Bay required, in accordance with Article 16 of the Treaty, the re-signing and re-ratification of the aforesaid Treaty. This process has just been completed in both countries.
Storish Re-Ratification of the Treaty of Bruges Bay
Gotzborg Re-Ratification of the Treaty of Bruges Bay
Chapter X of the Treaty of Bruges Bay
[/spoiler]Spoiler!
-
- FMS Staff
- Posts: 21546
- Joined: Sun Jun 24, 2007 7:37 pm
- Location: Cherry Trees, Craitland
- Contact:
Re: GTZ > STO
While some may wince at Stormark gaining land, this is certainly justified and all above-board. AYE...
Re: GTZ > STO
Call me a wincer then - this one's gonna have to be a NAY.
I would have considered a small portion to seed a future Gotzborg reboot in the spirit of the cited treaty, but I cannot countenance Gotzborg's entire territory becoming yet another unused swathe of Storish land.
I would have considered a small portion to seed a future Gotzborg reboot in the spirit of the cited treaty, but I cannot countenance Gotzborg's entire territory becoming yet another unused swathe of Storish land.
Re: GTZ > STO
Have to agree with Krasniy here, I do have a problem with just annexing states to keep them on the map. Imo - if you want to leave your nation and you're a one-man nation, then your nation should leave too. I don't really support large swathes of land just being present on the map if nothing's going to be done with them. As much as I respect Liam for what he's done, we shouldn't treat long standing members with byes, as such I'm giving this a NAY.
-
- Administrator General
- Posts: 4328
- Joined: Wed Dec 31, 2008 10:58 pm
- Location: Republic of Mercury
Re: GTZ > STO
Stormark aren't taking up any of the green here, and the treaty seems to be in order. Even if people disagree, they've followed the rules, so AYE.
Re: GTZ > STO
Taken into account the extremely long period of de facto inactivity that Gotzborg has been going through, and the significant expansions of Stormark in the past years, I will vote NAY on this. There comes a time where one should just make a decision: continue and boost activity, or call it quits.
Porque las estirpes condenadas a cien años de soledad no tenían una segunda oportunidad sobre la tierra.
-
- FMS Staff
- Posts: 21546
- Joined: Sun Jun 24, 2007 7:37 pm
- Location: Cherry Trees, Craitland
- Contact:
Re: GTZ > STO
Back to the drawing board, it seems...