An idea regarding culture
Moderator: Staff
- pawelabrams
- Posts: 3207
- Joined: Sun Jun 24, 2007 8:14 pm
- Location: Novograd, Interland
- Contact:
I think that culture is so complicated that cannot be "sorted" "marked" or whatever. CultureUpload - good. CultureMarking - bad
Pavel' Abramovic:, the President of Interland
IRL just a random guy from Poland. Still learning English.
IRL just a random guy from Poland. Still learning English.
-
- Posts: 232
- Joined: Wed Sep 26, 2007 6:39 pm
- Location: Puerto Carlos, Salamanca, Eastern Vanderveer-Tellia
Why not simply let nations upload to the CultureUpload, and let people rate cultural items out of 10 subjectively. You could pick a few editors who would work by Jeremy's mark scheme (as a rough guide I assume) who could rate it out of 10 too and even make an editor's pick of it if it warranted.
You could also expand that and take it beyond numbers and make qualitative reviews of it based on the opinions of those who could submit. Those reviews could be commented on, as could the items themselves.
If that's a bit much, group all the cultural items together and let the above happen on the whole of the culture.
E.g: Vanderveer-Tellia posts up one of our fictional history stories. Average Joe comes along and rates it out of 5 or 10 and goes on his way to the next bit. Then Better-than-Average Joseph comes along and reviews it as quite good whereas an editor could rate it as poor.
I think the above could both give the passing visitor a guide to what other micronationalists think of a nation, allow him to submit his opinion on the subject whilst not creating this craze of trying to tick boxes because nobody actually knows what to tick. People like what they like.
Consensus !
You could also expand that and take it beyond numbers and make qualitative reviews of it based on the opinions of those who could submit. Those reviews could be commented on, as could the items themselves.
If that's a bit much, group all the cultural items together and let the above happen on the whole of the culture.
E.g: Vanderveer-Tellia posts up one of our fictional history stories. Average Joe comes along and rates it out of 5 or 10 and goes on his way to the next bit. Then Better-than-Average Joseph comes along and reviews it as quite good whereas an editor could rate it as poor.
I think the above could both give the passing visitor a guide to what other micronationalists think of a nation, allow him to submit his opinion on the subject whilst not creating this craze of trying to tick boxes because nobody actually knows what to tick. People like what they like.
Consensus !
Cairney wrote:Happy Birthday to you, now make a wish which involves both Jess and a bus.
- Guido Zambelis
- Posts: 2854
- Joined: Sun Jun 24, 2007 5:26 pm
- dr-spangle
- Technical Advisor
- Posts: 13072
- Joined: Wed May 30, 2007 12:20 pm
- Contact: