So... Troop numbers
-
dr-spangle
- Technical Advisor
- Posts: 13072
- Joined: Wed May 30, 2007 12:20 pm
- Contact:
-
Colonel Vilhelm
- Apollo Foundation Administrator
- Posts: 2108
- Joined: Sun Jun 24, 2007 2:27 pm
- Location: Micras
- Contact:
Anunia Convention charter thing is actually the most accurate way to do it I think.
Colonel Vilhelm von Benkern - Preserving the Memories (Regardless of whose those may be)
Pro at Cooking!
Antica
Pro at Cooking!
Antica
-
pawelabrams
- Posts: 3207
- Joined: Sun Jun 24, 2007 8:14 pm
- Location: Novograd, Interland
- Contact:
Yep, I think Anunia will suit that...
Pavel' Abramovic:, the President of Interland
IRL just a random guy from Poland. Still learning English.
IRL just a random guy from Poland. Still learning English.
-
Colonel Vilhelm
- Apollo Foundation Administrator
- Posts: 2108
- Joined: Sun Jun 24, 2007 2:27 pm
- Location: Micras
- Contact:
In the MRWS, they have a system whereby you buy new troops every year. You have an Annual Defence Budget based on how many active citizens and how many active military men you have, which is then spent.
Wow! That sounds like a great idea! It really does.
Basic problem is if you're a member of the MRWS for 2 years you have twice as many troops as someone who's been a member for 1 year with the same number of troops. It's rather crazy like that. There's no cost to maintain your troops so you're sort of building them up until there's a war. If one nation decides to skip one war, next war they'll have many more troops at their disposal.
I like the simple premise of SNARL and Anunia - if you have commanders, they can command troops. Troops without a commander are useless. In MRWS you can keep buying troops for the same commanders every year until 5 years from now each commander is commanding 5x the number of troops of every other commander in micronationalism.
Just in case anyone's thinking "tl, dr", I'm saying: ANUNIA PLZ.
Wow! That sounds like a great idea! It really does.
Basic problem is if you're a member of the MRWS for 2 years you have twice as many troops as someone who's been a member for 1 year with the same number of troops. It's rather crazy like that. There's no cost to maintain your troops so you're sort of building them up until there's a war. If one nation decides to skip one war, next war they'll have many more troops at their disposal.
I like the simple premise of SNARL and Anunia - if you have commanders, they can command troops. Troops without a commander are useless. In MRWS you can keep buying troops for the same commanders every year until 5 years from now each commander is commanding 5x the number of troops of every other commander in micronationalism.
Just in case anyone's thinking "tl, dr", I'm saying: ANUNIA PLZ.
Colonel Vilhelm von Benkern - Preserving the Memories (Regardless of whose those may be)
Pro at Cooking!
Antica
Pro at Cooking!
Antica
-
dr-spangle
- Technical Advisor
- Posts: 13072
- Joined: Wed May 30, 2007 12:20 pm
- Contact:
-
Andreas the Wise
- Posts: 5024
- Joined: Sun Jun 24, 2007 8:34 pm
- Location: Novatainia
- Contact:
Glad to see its being used ...
Troops that were on a map like this and actively being 'developed' would count for that little bit of bonus experience in Anunia ...
Troops that were on a map like this and actively being 'developed' would count for that little bit of bonus experience in Anunia ...
Andreas
"He showed up three or four years ago and accidentally took over the micronational world by being way more competent and enthusiastic than everyone else. Now he sort of rules us all, but it's a benevolent sort of thing, as far as we know."
~Scott Alexander
"He showed up three or four years ago and accidentally took over the micronational world by being way more competent and enthusiastic than everyone else. Now he sort of rules us all, but it's a benevolent sort of thing, as far as we know."
~Scott Alexander
-
Lord_Montague
- Posts: 913
- Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2007 2:39 pm
