Ocian Federation's Orbat
Moderator: Staff
- Lord_Montague
- Posts: 913
- Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2007 2:39 pm
Re: Ocian Federation's Orbat
I will admit that the S-300s was a bit of a cock up on my part. I went through wikipedia's section of Russian Land Forces equipment and found the s-300 statistics which I figured were okay. What I was really lookiing for were SA-11s so I'm going to offer 2 compromises which the leaders of the allied parties can accept (some storyline bits added to clear up inaccuracies):
a) The S-300s were really all SA-11s and it was subterfuge on may part to make you think all think they were a bigger threat.
b) The S-300 force as it stands now (80 units) will be cut to 40.
The reason that the BM-30s are costed at 15 is because alone they are relatively weak. They have no direct means of defence and have to rely on people to spot their targets all those miles away. Meanwhile, armoured artillery is armoured and does have some direct means of defence as from what I'm aware their guns can fire over open sights. That is the justification for their low points as they fall in between being towed artillery and armoured artillery.
a) The S-300s were really all SA-11s and it was subterfuge on may part to make you think all think they were a bigger threat.
b) The S-300 force as it stands now (80 units) will be cut to 40.
The reason that the BM-30s are costed at 15 is because alone they are relatively weak. They have no direct means of defence and have to rely on people to spot their targets all those miles away. Meanwhile, armoured artillery is armoured and does have some direct means of defence as from what I'm aware their guns can fire over open sights. That is the justification for their low points as they fall in between being towed artillery and armoured artillery.
In Battle; Unbeatable.
In Victory; Unbearable.
In Victory; Unbearable.
-
- FMS Staff
- Posts: 672
- Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 1:02 am
Re: Ocian Federation's Orbat
Seriously... I based all actions of my fighters on the fact that you had S-300s with a range of 200 km and not SA-11s with a range of 50 km. That is one hell of a difference.
Malliki Tosha
Owner, Newport City FC [ANT]
Owner, Mortis Mercatoria FC [IRS]
Owner, Newport City FC [ANT]
Owner, Mortis Mercatoria FC [IRS]
- Lord_Montague
- Posts: 913
- Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2007 2:39 pm
Re: Ocian Federation's Orbat
You could have still used those fighters on anti-radar missions to destroy the SAMs like Chrim has attempted. Remember there were only 9 of them.
Since nobody has accepted the compromise of halving the number or accepting them as SA-11s I'm going with comrpomise (a) for story purposes.
Since nobody has accepted the compromise of halving the number or accepting them as SA-11s I'm going with comrpomise (a) for story purposes.
In Battle; Unbeatable.
In Victory; Unbearable.
In Victory; Unbearable.
-
- Posts: 537
- Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 8:26 pm
Re: Ocian Federation's Orbat
And I assume that since Ocia doesn't have anymore points to afford, those 90 anti-air units mentions are non-existant at all ?
- Lord_Montague
- Posts: 913
- Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2007 2:39 pm
Re: Ocian Federation's Orbat
I certainly didnt put them there so disregard them I'd say.
In Battle; Unbeatable.
In Victory; Unbearable.
In Victory; Unbearable.
-
- Posts: 146
- Joined: Thu Aug 13, 2009 3:49 am
Re: Ocian Federation's Orbat
Those anti air units ARE the sa-11's. I reorganized them into air defence units and deployed them to different cities.
-
- Posts: 537
- Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 8:26 pm
Re: Ocian Federation's Orbat
But you dont have any points to use against those anti-air units!