Page 4 of 6
Re: [Stormark] Canale di Tancredo d'Adraisio
Posted: Wed Sep 12, 2012 11:09 pm
by Aster
Prove me wrong then, Malliki. The timing was entirely coincidental, I'm sure
Re: [Stormark] Canale di Tancredo d'Adraisio
Posted: Thu Sep 13, 2012 1:15 am
by Malliki Tosha
Aster wrote:Prove me wrong then, Malliki. The timing was entirely coincidental, I'm sure
Rational people use scientific theory to prove an idea. You are asking me to prove something wrong, which isn't really the way these things work. The person that claims a position is also responsible for proving that position. Otherwise we would have all kinds of crazy shit.
Philosophical burden of proof
Argument from ignorance
9/11 Truther Convinced Government Destroyed Past 11 Years Of His Life
Re: [Stormark] Canale di Tancredo d'Adraisio
Posted: Thu Sep 13, 2012 1:24 am
by Hesam Jahandar
I suppose its just a coincidence that both Batavia and Babkha start with the letter B Malliki? If that's not enough, the second and last letters of both words are A. COINCIDENCE???
Re: [Stormark] Canale di Tancredo d'Adraisio
Posted: Thu Sep 13, 2012 1:58 am
by Malliki Tosha
Well, both Aster and Hitler ends with "er". Coincidence? I think not.
Re: [Stormark] Canale di Tancredo d'Adraisio
Posted: Thu Sep 13, 2012 1:32 pm
by Aster
lol I'm aware of the burden of proof and argument from ignorance, manchild.
The sudden change in policy regarding the straits and their membership in a certain little club is just so random, of course. I have my sources.
...Now off you go manchild.
Re: [Stormark] Canale di Tancredo d'Adraisio
Posted: Thu Sep 13, 2012 1:37 pm
by Malliki Tosha
Aster wrote:lol I'm aware of the burden of proof and argument from ignorance, manchild.
Then why behave like you're not?
Aster wrote:I have my sources.
The voices in your head are not a valid source.
Aster wrote:...Now off you go manchild.
Really? Can't you even come up with a new feeble insult?
Re: [Stormark] Canale di Tancredo d'Adraisio
Posted: Thu Sep 13, 2012 1:40 pm
by Aster
You have nothing remotely of interest to say, to anyone, anywhere in this hobby. You contribute *nothing* except insults. You're not wanted here. Go.away.
Re: [Stormark] Canale di Tancredo d'Adraisio
Posted: Thu Sep 13, 2012 1:42 pm
by Malliki Tosha
Aster wrote:You have nothing remotely of interest to say, to anyone, anywhere in this hobby. You contribute *nothing* except insults. You're not wanted here. Go.away.
I see that you concede defeat without presenting a shread of proof to support your accusations, except "I have my sources". I hope you realise that the only person you're making a fool of is yourself.
Re: [Stormark] Canale di Tancredo d'Adraisio
Posted: Thu Sep 13, 2012 2:25 pm
by Elijah Ayreon
Uh, sources? Please explain either who the sources are or what the sources actually said.
Re: [Stormark] Canale di Tancredo d'Adraisio
Posted: Thu Sep 13, 2012 3:45 pm
by Aster
I hope you realise that the only person you're making a fool of is yourself.
...Says the chap whose' "contributions" largely consist of swearing at everyone?
...Ardy, get in here and please control your dog. He's making a mess.
Re: [Stormark] Canale di Tancredo d'Adraisio
Posted: Thu Sep 13, 2012 3:48 pm
by Elijah Ayreon
You know, Aster. Just because someone swears at you doesn't mean you should go douchey yourself, you know.
Re: [Stormark] Canale di Tancredo d'Adraisio
Posted: Thu Sep 13, 2012 5:16 pm
by Ardashir Khan
Aster,
Malliki has his own robust style of debating it is neither my place nor is it in my interests to 'control' him, even if I could. Now about these mythical sources of yours. The conspiracy theories are getting a tad old.
Re: [Stormark] Canale di Tancredo d'Adraisio
Posted: Thu Sep 13, 2012 5:53 pm
by Malliki Tosha
Aster wrote:I hope you realise that the only person you're making a fool of is yourself.
...Says the chap whose' "contributions" largely consist of swearing at everyone?
...Ardy, get in here and please control your dog. He's making a mess.
No, I don't swear at everyone, just some people. Like you. Since you deserve it.
Seriously, your pathetic attempts at insults, accusations and conspiracy theories are getting old and tiresome. I agree with Ardy, either put up or shut up. Mythical sources and post hoc arguments are not valid evidence.
Re: [Stormark] Canale di Tancredo d'Adraisio
Posted: Thu Sep 13, 2012 5:54 pm
by Ardashir Khan
Clarification: Conspiracy theories that are cold war banter are fine. It's the ones you actually believe that I have a problem with.
Re: [Stormark] Canale di Tancredo d'Adraisio
Posted: Fri Sep 14, 2012 7:25 am
by Benkern
Ahem. The Aster & Co Half-Time Show seems to have moved on, so we can get back on topic,
Mordechai B.E. wrote:Since the Lingelande situation seems to be solved we can now accept the proposal.
This is great news. Since both parties have agreed to the draft I ask them both now to sign and submit the Treaty to their respective ratification procedures.