RIB Flag change
Moderator: Staff
RIB Flag change
Name & Title: Ryker of the Sovereign Confederation and the Republic of Inner Benacia
E-Mail/Contact: PM
Nation: Republic of Inner Benacia
Request:
Notes: Just need to change the flag from the green triangle to this since the SC is the occupying force per the Slavegate Convention and we do love branding.
E-Mail/Contact: PM
Nation: Republic of Inner Benacia
Request:
Notes: Just need to change the flag from the green triangle to this since the SC is the occupying force per the Slavegate Convention and we do love branding.
Re: RIB Flag change
This is not how I read the Convention at all, it only mentions military observers. This needs confirmation from the previous representatives of the RIB.
Porque las estirpes condenadas a cien años de soledad no tenían una segunda oportunidad sobre la tierra.
Re: RIB Flag change
It could be argued that Ketek's responsibility for the preparation of infrastructure and habitable conditions conferred in 2.2 entails, in the circumstances, a necessary usurpation of the powers of the moribund Dolmen state.
As to the nebulous question of who actually represents the RIB before the MCS, the precedents give Octy (moved on to other things alas), Ric (overthrown) and most recently Ardy (de facto steward of the RIB narrative for some time and Slavegate Convention signatory). I would tend to favour the latter.
Speaking as the other signatory, I didn't actually expect the Ketek claim to encompass the whole of the non-occupied zone but I'm cool with it.
As to the nebulous question of who actually represents the RIB before the MCS, the precedents give Octy (moved on to other things alas), Ric (overthrown) and most recently Ardy (de facto steward of the RIB narrative for some time and Slavegate Convention signatory). I would tend to favour the latter.
Speaking as the other signatory, I didn't actually expect the Ketek claim to encompass the whole of the non-occupied zone but I'm cool with it.
-
- Posts: 458
- Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2016 8:06 pm
Re: RIB Flag change
As "de facto steward of the RIB narrative" I endorse this until such time as I decide otherwise.
I didn't either, but I guess nature really must abhor a vacuum after all.Yastreb wrote: I didn't actually expect the Ketek claim to encompass the whole of the non-occupied zone
All this has happened before, and all this will happen again.
Re: RIB Flag change
You're exactly right. To best repair Stonetree and make its infrastructure safe with any hope of the region not falling into backwards disrepair post-occupation, the entire neutral territory must be brought up to SC/Ketek standards. Otherwise we're just putting a coat of paint on a rusted-out clunker.Yastreb wrote: ↑Fri Aug 02, 2019 10:38 pmIt could be argued that Ketek's responsibility for the preparation of infrastructure and habitable conditions conferred in 2.2 entails, in the circumstances, a necessary usurpation of the powers of the moribund Dolmen state.
...
Speaking as the other signatory, I didn't actually expect the Ketek claim to encompass the whole of the non-occupied zone but I'm cool with it.