Judicial petitions
- Guido Zambelis
- Posts: 2854
- Joined: Sun Jun 24, 2007 5:26 pm
Judicial petitions
If you want to bring a petition, start a new thread in accordance with the following rules:
POST TITLE:
[JP] <name of petitioner> vs. <name of defendant>; <some identifying name for locality in which the action is being disputed>
Example:POST TEXT:[JP] Lord Montague vs. Jeremy; outside Willow
1. Name of the petitioner
2. Name of the defendant
3. Statement of the Facts (including links to posts)
4. What the DEFENDANT has done 'wrong' to cause the petition to be brought
5. What the PETITIONER feels should be done to rectify the situation
(VII. Judging)
B. When one parties requests a judgement, they must start a new thread, clearly titled with the matter to be judged and the two opposing commanders involved. They must then explain what they believe needs to be judged (whether this be how realistic an action is, or to protest losses etc), and provide a link to the offended post or posts.
C. Their opponent must be given a chance to respond, and discuss the matter outside of the war thread with the opposing party. Once this chance has been given, the Judge may deliver his judgement based on the arguments of the two parties, the points involved, and his knowledge of realistic military combat.
D. Judging may change the losses invoked by the 24 hour rule but ONLY where this is clearly unrealistic.