[NAT] Lichtstadt (not a claim)
Moderator: Staff
[NAT] Lichtstadt (not a claim)
So the Natopian island and city of Lichtstadt (southern Cibolan islands) is somehow not marked as Natopian (but green, but with a city). Could you please make it Natopian in colour?
[Moved from Claims & Modifications by Craitman]
[Moved from Claims & Modifications by Craitman]
-
- FMS Staff
- Posts: 21547
- Joined: Sun Jun 24, 2007 7:37 pm
- Location: Cherry Trees, Craitland
- Contact:
Re: [NAT] Lichtstadt (not a claim)
None of the islands off the south of Cibola are coloured green, and Lichtstad's is the correct colour for Natopian land as it is
Re: [NAT] Lichtstadt (not a claim)
I thought this was one of your ninja edit jokes until I looked at my hard drive copyCraitman wrote:None of the islands off the south of Cibola are coloured green, and Lichtstad's is the correct colour for Natopian land as it is
Maybe it's been mixed up with Birgeshir? The latter's map colour is greenish and Lichtstad's name is closer to Birgeshir city than to Lichtstad itself.
-
- FMS Staff
- Posts: 21547
- Joined: Sun Jun 24, 2007 7:37 pm
- Location: Cherry Trees, Craitland
- Contact:
Re: [NAT] Lichtstadt (not a claim)
You should know I only ever save those for Sundays when I need to quickly amend the drying paint on the latest update
Perhaps, though Birgeshir's city symbol is a country capital one which (probably) wouldn't be relevant for LichstadMaybe it's been mixed up with Birgeshir? The latter's map colour is greenish and Lichtstad's name is closer to Birgeshir city than to Lichtstad itself.
Re: [NAT] Lichtstadt (not a claim)
Ah yes, Kras was right!
I apologize for accidentally claiming Birgeshir! Wont happen again.
Thanks guys.
I apologize for accidentally claiming Birgeshir! Wont happen again.
Thanks guys.